|
发表于 2016-3-30 13:30:46
只看该作者
13#
本帖最后由 woody.lee 于 2016-3-30 17:45 编辑
這是修改成 0x16的實測數據
接線單純
Server <-> GigaSwitch <-> RK3288
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1220 V2 @ 3.10GHz Chip: BroadCom Firefly RK3288
測第一次跟測第二次有明顯的差異
我是用雙系統,
估計問題是在這
測第一次的時候只更新 resource.img -> Resource
測第二次的時候有更新 boot.img -> Recovery
另外, 如果用 windows 做 iperf的驗證
-r, --tradeoff Do a bidirectional test individually
有加 -r 可以得到
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.107.154, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 192 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 5] local 192.168.107.156 port 58905 connected with 192.168.107.154 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 1.04 GBytes 893 Mbits/sec
[ 4] local 192.168.107.156 port 5001 connected with 192.168.107.154 port 59842
[ 4] 0.0-10.5 sec 1.13 GBytes 930 Mbits/sec
沒加 -r 得到的數據很差:
------------------------------------------------------------
Server listening on TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 85.3 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to 192.168.107.154, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 192 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------
[ 5] local 192.168.107.156 port 58906 connected with 192.168.107.154 port 5001
[ 4] local 192.168.107.156 port 5001 connected with 192.168.107.154 port 59845
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 5] 0.0-10.0 sec 958 MBytes 803 Mbits/sec
[ 4] 0.0-10.0 sec 288 MBytes 241 Mbits/sec
懷疑是 M$系統有做頻寬保留的動作.
|
|